Por el Otro Lado...

Conservation & Sustainable Development in the Ecuadorian Chocó

Nanegal / Santa Lucía,  Pichincha, Ecuador


 

CONSERVATION ISSUES:

(Come back soon for future articles on Pesticides & other Environmental issues affecting the Chocó)

 

The Great Talaguanta Rescue - Or, Protecting Endangered Species in the Cloud Forest

It began with the water running dry ­ yet again ­ in our little house near Nanegal, a small pueblo in the Chocó cloudforest region, about two hours northwest of Quito, Ecuador. This often happened after a heavy rain, when mud and debris, carried over from the swollen ravine which was our water source, would stop things up. But this time it hadn´t been raining, and an inspection of the nearly half mile of plastic pipe going up the hillside revealed a different problem ­ the black plastic had been chewed through, obviously by an animal with sharp, squared-off teeth.

The animal turned out to be a large rodent, called by the locals Talaguanta. Its scientific name is Dinomys branickii; in English it´s called the Pacarana. Few people outside of the locals here have heard of this rodent, which resembles a giant, spotted and striped hamster or guinea pig (but about four times the size of the latter). Unfortunately for the Talaguanta, it´s apparently both tasty and slow, and therefore a popular and easy prey for hunters. Not surprisingly, it´s increasingly rare - The Red Book of Mammals of Ecuador lists this species as vulnerable on a national scale, and endangered internationally.

It was decided that it would be better to relocate what was in fact, a pair of Talaguantas, because of the precarious state of their species, and their proximity to a populated area with many avid hunters (not to mention their fondness for chewing through plastic water pipe). The Santa Lucía Cloud Forest Reserve (link) seemed an ideal relocation area, given its relative isolation and protection from hunting. Other populations of Talaguanta had been spotted in parts of the reserve, so there was confidence that the habitat and climate was adequate for this pair as well.

The pair were captured relatively easily (confirming the suspicion that they would have been in danger from local hunters if left in their original location, which was sure to become known sooner or later.) In an unfortunate twist to the story, however, one of the pair escaped, when a well-meaning local guide let it loose on the ground so that a group of visiting students could photograph it. The remaining Talaguanta was safely transported to the Santa Lucia reserve, in the proximity of others of its species, where it is hoped to have safely adapted to its new home.

**

The problem of protecting endangered or vulnerable species in poor Third World countries is not a trivial one. For people living on the edge of survival, hunting is not a sport or luxury ­ it may be their only means of keeping meat on the table for their families. Similarly, an animal which is viewed as a potential threat to livestock or crops will generally be eliminated by local farmers without question, regardless of its endangered status. That local farmer can´t afford to lose even the few chickens which might be taken by an Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis), or the corn eaten by a Spectacled Bear (Tremarctos ornatus). Endangered species protection is an abstract concept which brings no visible benefit to the farmer, whereas the immediate losses he perceives are too great a hardship, and worth much more to him.

Creating reserves like Santa Lucia and others is a first step in protecting habitat for these and other endangered species. However, many of the predators which are most endangered are wide-ranging and not ´containable´ within the (to them) invisible boundaries of a reserve. Once they leave those boundaries, they are no longer protected from the potential threat posed by farmers and hunters. This is true not only for the Ocelot and Spectacled Bear, but also for other vulnerable or endangered species found in Santa Lucia, such as the Mountain Andean Cat (Oncifelis colocolo), Andean Puma (Puma concolor), Jaguarundi (Herpailurus yaguarundi), and the Black ­and-Chestnut Eagle (Oroaetus isidori).

This problem is not unique to the Third World ­ it also occurs in the American West where gray wolves reintroduced to protected areas have run into opposition from local ranchers due to real or perceived livestock losses. Here, however, there are fewer governmental protections to help mediate between farmers and environmental interests (by for example, instituting some sort of compensation scheme.) This task of environmental mediation, as well as environmental education, generally falls here to non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Santa Lucia, for example, has in the past given environmental education classes and excursions in the cloud forest reserve for children and adults of the surrounding community. Granted, it isn´t the whole solution ­ but it is a start.

- Mary Finn - February 2005

 

 

Birds & Shade Coffee

The following is an excerpt from a presentation by Paul J. Baicich of the Swarovski Birding Community (SBC - www.swarovskibirding.com) to the Dupage County Illinois Birding Club (www.dupagebirding.org):

(Those interested in Coffee & Conservation issues should also see Planeta´s Coffee and Birding Guide (http://www.planeta.com/ecotravel/ag/coffee/coffee.html)

¨Believe it or not, you can save birds with every cup of coffee that you drink.¨

¨Older varieties of coffee (shade-grown coffee) are grown under the shade of treees in order to retain and nourish the soil and moderate the heat and light reaching the plants. Coffee farms that mimic forest conditions in Latin America and the Caribbean actually are saving Neotropicl migrant birds and are also a refuge for local resident birds.

Depending on the species of shade trees and the structure of the tree cover, anywhere from a few to scores of resident and migratory bird species will rely on coffee farms for food and cover. Ornithologists have consistently documented the importance of shad-coffee habitat in the increasingly deforested landscape of the Neotropics.¨

So, what can you do to help promote shade coffee and save birds?

Among Swarovski Birding Community´s suggestions:

  • Become an educated consumer - buy shade-grown coffee and ask for it at restaurants and espresso stands
  • Support organizations that work on these important coffee issues
  • Raise this issue with your local birding organizations and fellow birders and conservationists

And From SBC´s September Newsletter:

¨BIG CANS MOVE TOWARD SUSTAINABLE COFFEE:

Giant companies involved in mass-produced coffees (e.g., Phillip Morris, Nestle, and Procter & Gamble) have been reluctant to confront the issue of sustainable, fair-trade, organic, and shade-grown coffees. This may be changing with an announcement from Procter & Gamble in early August.

P&G has been marketing its "Signature Collection" (Millstone) online and through phone orders since September 2003. Now it is about to introduce two of these specialty coffees into grocery and retail stores throughoutthe country, starting this fall. Their "Millstone Organic Mountain Moonlight" will be Fair Trade Certified and their "Millstone Rainforest Reserve" will be Rainforest Alliance Certified.

Fair Trade Certification ensures that coffee-growing communities are paid a fair, living wage. Rainforest Alliance Certification works to protect the environment. Does that mean that both of the P&G coffees are"bird-compatible?" Well, almost. Fair Trade coffees are estimated to be80%-likely to be shade-grown. Similarly, the Rainforest Alliancecertification is not as strict as other standards for shade, but it is ahuge step in the right direction.

For more information on bird-compatible, shade-grown coffee, see the following two sites:

http://nationalzoo.si.edu/ConservationAndScience/MigratoryBirds/Coffee/
http://americanbirding.org/programs/conssbcof3.htm

To subscribe to SBC´s e-newsletter, contact

Wayne Petersen <wayne.petersen@swarovskibirding.com>

OR Paul Baicich <paul.baicich@swarovskibirding.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RETURN

 

Copyright mary Finn 2004

Last updated February 22, 2005